STARTBODY

Teach English in Zhengjiazhai Zhen - Dezhou Shi

Do you want to be TEFL or TESOL-certified and teach in Zhengjiazhai Zhen? Are you interested in teaching English in Dezhou Shi? Check out ITTT’s online and in-class courses, Become certified to Teach English as a Foreign Language and start teaching English ONLINE or abroad! ITTT offers a wide variety of Online TEFL Courses and a great number of opportunities for English Teachers and for Teachers of English as a Second Language.

Traditionally, intelligence has been regarded as a unitary quantity. This narrowly limited the discriminating factor of whether a child was “smart” or “educationally adept”. Teachers could therefore focus the creation of their course syllabi to be built from a perspective of ascertaining the subject content to cover and how best to teach it (Alrabah, Wu, & Alotaibi, 2018, p. 38). But research was done by Gardner (1983) to suggest that there are different categories of intelligence and that everyone has some intelligence in every category (Hine, 1996). Gardner’s research contributed along with the consumerism of the classroom to shift the focus of the syllabus to instead ask the question, “’How do students learn and how can the teacher best facilitate the learning process?’(Alrabah et al., 2018, p. 3)”. Both Alrabah (2018) and Hine (1996) explain that previous research has shown that students whose teachers use a pedagogy that supports multiple intelligences learn better than those whose teachers use a traditional, unitary stance of intelligence. Alrabah cited in his literature review that several research studies found that students of differing subjects performed better and had more motivation in learning when their learning styles where accommodated in the pedagogy. Hine stated that there has been research to show that not only can influenced pedagogy increase a particular type of intelligence, it can also develop new intelligences. She explains how research has shown that with the plasticity of the brain, individual’s intelligences change and shape over time. Hine’s (1996) view of plasticity creates a different theme in her article than that of Alrabah (2008). She advocates that a pedagogy that evenly encompasses all of the categories of intelligence will help to give students a more rounded and complete level of intelligence. She states, “Current research indicates that the only limit to one's intelligence is what the individual believes is possible and how his or her behaviors either foster or limit his or her intelligence (Hine, 1996).” Alrabah’s (2018) study operates under the assumption that students will have stronger intelligences than others and to pinpoint them and accommodate them on a case by case basis is way to increase student’s motivation and performance. In his convenience sampling of a college in Kuwait University, he found what intelligences were prevalent to the student body and advocated for focusing on those intelligences. He also added an element of learning styles to his research, something that Hine does not allude to. Alrabah (2018) states that as intelligences focus on problem solving, as also stated by Hine (1996), learning styles describe how information input can take different forms for different students. While Hine (1996) refers to early education and younger learners in her writing and Alrabah (2018) did his research among college students, it seems that Hine’s assertion that brain elasticity plays an important role in intelligences over time, the saliency of the learners age in the research is considerably diminished. Though educational theory in general supports the idea that as people age, learning slows and becomes more of a task, it still seems that Hine’s assertions should still be applicable to college level students. No matter what approach is taken, a more wholistic coverage of the intelligences or focusing on individual intelligent strengths of a particular class, both researchers would agree that pedagogy that is more specified with activities and strategies influenced by a more detailed description of intelligences than the traditional explanation can afford will enhance the effectiveness of the teaching, learning and application of the content. Alrabah, S., Wu, S., & Alotaibi, A. M. (2018). The Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences of EFL College Students in Kuwait. International Education Studies, 11(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n3p38 Hine, C. (1996). Developing Multiple Intelligences in Young Learners. Early Childhood News, 8(6), 23–29.


ENDBODY