As my own experience, even if you have the
degree or any
certificate that proofs you are eligible to teach
english but not a native speaker, discrimination is always there. I have seen the reality and proved that those
efl schools who always would want to hire a native speaker even if they didn't even reach college or don't have any
degree in teaching as long as they speak and looks
english, you are hire!
All over the world more and more
efl schools advertise their courses highlighting that they only employ native speakers and reject applicants on the ground that it is the customers expectation, opening the gates wide for native
teachers and giving more obstacles to non-native ones (until they find themselves in a desperate need for a
teacher?). But is it really the customers Expectation? Unfortunately teaching ability is not part of the mother tongue package! Non-native
teachers could be compared with young new
teachers of any subject they have just graduated: depending on their teaching ability, their skills in the subject, their personality, their relationship with students, their awareness of their real expectations, they may become better
teachers than their own old masters?
Like this fresh young
teacher high school students can feel close to, a non-native
teacher owns interesting aspects for the
efl learner as he used to be one of them: he has learnt
english as a foreign language. He may be for them a real living model of succeeding in
english, a great source of motivation, important asset for beginners, elementary and low intermediate students who can see him only a few steps ahead of them. If he's done it, they can do it!... Regarding the accent, the
teacher can always use his sound equipment (cassette, CDs, DVDs) to show them different kinds, the way of speaking they should aim. A non-native
teacher, whatever his accent may be, is aware of it and its differences with typical British or American accents, which is sometimes lacked by some natives all over the world.
As they learnt
english at school, the non-native
teachers had to look at and analyze the language and work out why and how it is the way it is. Before attaining fluency, a non-native speaker had to build up his mind to think in
english, unlike a mother tongue that we may accept as given. Planning his lessons, a non-native
teacher always has in mind his former experiences as an
efl learner, the difficulties he and his mates, reluctant or overactive, experienced, the good and bad sides of his former
teachers and their methodologies. A non-native
teacher is always an experienced learner.
The
efl courses are cross-cultural courses, experiences which non- native
teachers had been through before, living, studying or working in an
english environment (more than often, reason for his fluency). Dedicate ones are able to adapt to, retain and explain several languages and cultures starting from their own and an
english one at least. Regarding school policies, the non-native
teacher may have to focus only on
english cultures but is able to go to a wider multicultural communication, which is the main aim of the
efl worldwide. Even if for specific courses, like short advanced British or American career orientated ones, a native
teacher from the specific country may be the logical choice, on a wider basis a non- native
teacher, teaching in a foreign country, isn't the successful symbol of the
efl?